orwin a day ago

Interestingly, American express hired my uncle to help them integrate smart chips into credit card in the late 90s. He took the Concord twice a month on a Paris-NY. It was hell, a lot of different banks and a love of magnetic stripe despite the fraud being easier with those prevented any mass adoption. I think that while he was successful technologically (American express credit card had a chip i think? But honestly i'm not sure, don't take my word for it _at all_), but politically it was a sysiphian effort and they scraped the project. For him the reason was that the cost of fraud was lower than in France, and also pushed into users, and unless you made bank liable (i think that's the word) in case of fraud, so a more secure method of payment wasn't interesting for the banks (in that case why american express?).

Anyway, all that to say that from what i've heard from him, AmEx, Visa and masterCard had to be from the US because the banking sector was so fragmented, in so many ways (different actors, different regulations, different fraud tolerance), it was sorely needed.

  • ggm a day ago

    Steve Kent from BBN told me how they bootstrapped the original trust anchor which signed over the card conpanies PKI using an HSM module. After they initialised the subsidiary CAs they destroyed the private key hardware, and some of them wanted to take bits home to put in lucite as a memento but others were worried it was a skymesh moment and enough information could be gleaned from chip remains they'd reveal the private key.

    (The public key proof was all they wanted, no reuse intended of this keypair)

comrade1234 a day ago

Eurocard? That’d be too obvious right? Visa, Mastercard, Eurocard?

Make a credit card, get a European bank to back you, slap a picture of some generic bridge or Romanesque building on it. No faces! Can’t offend any country in the eu by posting a face from some other country…

Sorry, just cynical. This is a great idea but would require a sort of teamwork and patriotism the eu doesn’t have in order for it to be successful.

joegibbs a day ago

What is the cause of Europe always needing a top-down effort for a European cloud, a European payment provider, a European Facebook and Google, a European X, Y, Z rather than European companies filling these gaps naturally? It's a wealthy union of 450 million people - surely there are benefits for local companies like knowledge of the local business environment, people who fluently speak local languages - why are American companies eating their breakfast?

  • jltsiren a day ago

    Europe is too decentralized. Each country has its own languages, cultures, laws, and politics. If you leave things to the market, the chances are you get a large number of regional solutions tailored to the local conditions. None of which is clearly superior to the others, and all of which are too small to benefit from economies of scale.

    And then bigger companies from countries with larger domestic markets come and buy the most successful ones.

  • M95D a day ago

    I belive it's a chicken/egg problem. A new card won't be accepted anywhere so no buyers will want one, and vendors won't implement a new card unless there are enough buyers to be worth it.

    • enz 18 hours ago

      I believe EU could think of making adoption mandatory among merchants (UE-based or not) doing business with UE citizens.

moltar 19 hours ago

Russia did it.

I’m sure EU could, if they wanted to.